The largest concern of our leaders today is not COVID-19, but rather the trade losses of investors

Our economic system is not designed to assist the public in the event of emergencies. The policies of the private Federal Reserve System of banks focus only on profits of the financial and corporate sectors of the economy. Howard Switzer of the Green Party of Tennessee explains: When we are faced with a pandemic situation, the largest concern of our leaders is not the disease, but rather the trade losses of investors who benefit from the private for-profit monetary system. Public need for money during a crisis is precisely the time the financial system fails.”

In the past three years five of the major financial institutions in the U.S. have shoveled billions of dollars into energy companies that are major contributors to climate change. The financial institutions not only provide debt financing, but invest in the stocks and bonds of the corporations, and are major shareholders in many of the largest energy companies and weapons manufacturers. The major concern of the Fed is to protect the investors during this crisis. The investors are not losing real wealth. They are losing artificial wealth that has risen in value caused by speculative investing.

Congress long ago gave up its Constitutional responsibility for the creation of money, and handed it over to a private banking cartel. When the big banks refused to help the nation fight against its possible division in the Civil War, Greenbacks came to the rescue. Greenbacks are debt-free government money created as an asset, not a debt, and today offer the safest alternative to getting the nation and the world out of debt and through this and other crises. The hegemony of the global financial industry and its private for-profit money system must now be replaced with a public money system in order to fund an effective response world-wide.

Sue Peters, Green Party New York notes, “Legislation was written, vetted and introduced to Congress in 2011, to replace the speculative Federal Reserve System with a reliable, stable-value monetary system. The NEED Act (HR 2990 – 112th Congress) was shelved by the Banking Committee at that time and remains at the ready. Now is the time to make this important change”.

The monetary reforms proposed in the Green Party platform would create a public money system that is not based on debt. Money would not be created by banks and would not disappear in a crisis. Kevin McCormick of the Green Party of Texas explains: “Public money is permanent in the sense that it is not a mere entry in a bank ledger, but instead is created by Congress to serve the public good.” Unlike the Federal Reserve System, dealing with a pandemic would not automatically become a financial crisis. Instead we would have a government able to respond effectively and swiftly in a crisis with the power to fully fund a public healthcare system.

Greenbacks are permanently circulating money that does not require a loan from a bank. Greenbacks could be used for investments in health care, infrastructure, replacing fossil fuels, and ending wars. Now is the time for Congress to revisit its Constitutional responsibility to the American people.

Banking and Monetary Reform Committee
March 16, 2020

Contact Mary Sanderson GPWI & Howard Switzer GPTN at [email protected] 




About The Author

4
Leave a Reply

If you are a registered user, Click here to Login. If you want to comment without registering, use the comment form below.
avatar
2 Comment threads
2 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
4 Comment authors
Govert SchullerMary SandersonPaul LebowJohn Howell Recent comment authors
  Notifications  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Mary Sanderson
Member
Mary Sanderson

Please add the tag ‘Greenbacks’ to this piece so it will come up in the search that way.

0
Govert Schuller
Admin

Done. 8^)

0
John Howell
Guest
John Howell

Even with a sovereign money system in place, the pandemic would have caused major disruption. We still would have had to undergo social distancing, which keeps people from doing their jobs and from being “consumers.” Under a sovereign money system we might have had a better public health system in place to deal better with people coming down with the Covid-19-induced illness. But even in places like Italy, which had a universal healthcare system, the system was overloaded by the pandemic. Even with a sovereign money in place there might have been a stock market crash as industries ground to… Read more »

Paul Lebow
Admin
Paul Lebow

Sovereign Money is

    enabling

, its not policy. Under SM we could have had the reserve hospital space, the stockpile of masks and tests, a trained rapid response health care network and a supplemental income program in place. Without SM, we can’t have this. Authoritarianism in China allowed them to rapidly respond to the lack of foresight they share with other nations who operate under a bank-money system. So I don’t think the claims for SM are exaggerated at all.

0